About the School
The School of Asian Studies is one of Russia’s leading centers of East Asian and Middle Eastern studies. The school promotes a comprehensive approach to the study of Eastern countries, and its most important mission is to provide initial training in the fundamental principles of East Asian and Middle Eastern studies, followed by specialisation in the historical, cultural, religious, socio-economic, and political development of the traditional and modern East, as well as Russia’s interaction with Eastern countries. The school offers an intensive programme of both classical and modern Eastern languages, combining the teaching of the academic fundamentals of Eastern studies with practical skills for working with countries in East Asia and the Middle East.
Project of the School of Asian Studies
The Mediterranean Region in the Context of Political Processes in the Middle East and North Africa →
Administration
Larisa Zeltyn
Deputy Head of the School
Alexandra Sizova
Deputy Head of the School
Publications
-
Book
The Russian Koreans in the 1920s and 1930s. An Ethnic Community in the Face of Soviet Power
This book offers the first comprehensive exploration of the history of Soviet Koreans (1920s-1930s), focusing into their experiences in the USSR. It examines the impact of Stalin's foreign and domestic policies on
Soviet Koreans, their role in the socio-economic development of the Far East, and their contributions to the Red Army, as well as the cultural and educational aspects of their lives. Key themes include the political repression of Soviet Koreans during Stalin’s era and their subsequent rehabilitation in the Russian Federation.Brill, 2025.
-
Article
Reevaluating the Circumstances Surrounding the Conclusion of the 1876 Kanghwa Treaty between Korea and Japan
The Treaty of Kanghwa, 1876, was the first in succession of what are known to historians as “unequal treaties” that integrated the state of Chosŏn (Korea) into the global diplomatic and economic processes in the late nineteenth century. Korean historiography has traditionally emphasized the involuntary nature of the treaty, stressing that the Chosŏn government was forced to sign it following the threat of Japanese retaliation. At the same time, the actions of the government in Tokyo are often assessed as pre-meditated, part of a wider plan, and, sometimes, aimed at the eventual annexation of the Korean Peninsula. In other words, so far as the events of 1876 are concerned, Japan is the aggressor, and Chosŏn the victim.
The author of this paper aims to provide a more balanced and objective assessment of the series of historical events that led to the signing of the Korea-Japan Treaty in 1876, based on a comprehensive analysis of the domestic political circumstances in both countries and the geopolitical situation in the Northeast Asian region. The paper offers a critique of the analytical theory that the Treaty of Kanghwa was part of a plan to colonize Korea, and highlights the possibility that the government of Chosŏn made its own decision to sign the treaty.European Journal of Korean Studies. 2025. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 97-114.
-
Book chapter
Post-Soviet Realignment: Key Milestones in Pakistan–Russia Bilateral Relations
The post-Cold War international order has bes characterized by significant shifts in the foreign polic strategies of nations, as global geopolitical dynamics underwent profound transformation. For Pakistan and Russia, the end of the Soviet Union marked a pivotal turning point providing an opportunity to recalibrate their historically complicated relationship, The Cold War had positioned Pakistan and Russia on opposing sides of the ideological divide.
In bk.: Pakistan-Russia Relations. A Comprehensive Historical and Strategic Analysis. Islamabad: Centre for Strategic Perspectives. Institute of Strategic Studies, 2025. Ch. 2. P. 18-36.
-
Working paper
Extended Family Structures Exert a Causal Influence on Fertility
Research of the impact of kin alloparenting on reproduction mainly focuses on mother’s parents and parents-in-law. The impact on fertility of extended families and the alloparental help with childcare they can provide has received much less attention. Moreover, there is an important lacuna in the existing studies of this problem, as it is mostly approached through correlational studies, while the presence of a causal link remains unclear. Using an instrumental variables approach, we demonstrate that prevalence of extended family structures exert a causal influence on fertility. A one standard-deviation increase in prevalence of extended families is associated with approximately 1.07 additional children per woman. These results highlight that family structure is not only statistically significant but also demographically consequential in shaping fertility outcomes.SocArXiv. Soc. SocArXiv, 2025